Intervention911 v. City of Palm Springs
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion
O 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 INTERVENTION911, Case № 5:13-cv-01117-ODW (SPx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL [554] 14 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Intervention911’s Motion to Vacate 19 Judgment of Dismissal. (Mot. Vacate (“Mot.”), ECF No. 554.) The matter is fully 20 briefed. (Opp’n, ECF No. 555; Reply, ECF No. 557.) For the following reasons, the 21 Court DENIES Intervention911’s Motion.1 22 II. BACKGROUND 23 On…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meadows v. Dominican RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Yair HoltzmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Michael Bynoe v. Isidro BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Pacific Cornetta, Inc. v. JungDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2003