Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re C.M.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 29, 2012No. 2011-647Published

1DissentConboy, J.

After recognizing for over thirty years a statutory right to counsel for indigent parents in abuse or neglect proceedings, New Hampshire apparently has become the only state in the country to abolish this right. Because I conclude that the due process protections afforded under the New Hampshire Constitution require the appointment of counsel for indigent parents in State-initiated proceedings brought pursuant to RSA chapter 169-C, I respectfully dissent.

Part I, Article 2 of the New Hampshire Constitution provides that “All men have certain natural, essential, and inherent rights — among…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. In Re the Welfare of LuscierWashington Supreme Court · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API