In re C.M.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1DissentConboy, J.
After recognizing for over thirty years a statutory right to counsel for indigent parents in abuse or neglect proceedings, New Hampshire apparently has become the only state in the country to abolish this right. Because I conclude that the due process protections afforded under the New Hampshire Constitution require the appointment of counsel for indigent parents in State-initiated proceedings brought pursuant to RSA chapter 169-C, I respectfully dissent.
Part I, Article 2 of the New Hampshire Constitution provides that “All men have certain natural, essential, and inherent rights — among…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In Re the Welfare of LuscierWashington Supreme Court · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.