Legal Opinion

Trainor v. Buchanan Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 1923No. 23,063PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.

This is an action by buyer against seller to recover damages for breach >of contract of sale. Plaintiff recovered damages. Defendant appeals.

On April 26, 1916, defendant’s predecessor in interest submitted this proposal in writing duly signed:

“We hereby propose to ship you at Minneapolis, Minnesota, so much of our coal as you may order (not to exceed the tonnage of each size as shown below) during the period commencing this date and ending March 31, 1917, at a net price to you of for April and May, $1.45, June 1.50, July, 1.55, August, 1.65, Sept. 1916 to March 1st, 1917, 1.75 and for March…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Marshall v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Imperial Refining Co. v. Kanotex Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. McCord v. AshbaughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Grant v. Fisher Flouring Mills Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Johnson v. FarrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API