Legal Opinion
People v. Gonzalez
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 13, 2014PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Abdus-Salaam, J.
Under CPL 250.10, a defendant must provide notice of intent to offer evidence in connection with the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance (EED). We have held that a defendant seeking to admit expert or lay testimony related to an EED defense must comply with the notice requirement before that defense may be submitted to the jury (see People v Diaz, 15 NY3d 40, 46-47 [2010]; People v Berk, 88 NY2d 257, 263 [1996]). The question presented here is whether CPL 250.10 applies where the defendant offers no evidence at trial hut requests an EED…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. CasassaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. MoyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. BerkNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. AlmonorNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- The People v. Jose ValentinNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MohamudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. SidburyNew York Court of Appeals · 2024
- People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.