Legal Opinion

One-Two East 87th St. Corp. v. Rees

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 28, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The proof clearly establishes a violation of the express terms of the lease, projected into the statutory tenancy. The mere fact that tenant’s friend paid her no rent for the occupancy does not affect the fact that such use of the apartment, without landlord’s consent, violates the lease (Irweis Holding Corp. v. Glenn, 2 Misc 2d 804; 820 E. 57th St. Corp. v. Peckham, 63 N. Y. S. 2d 357). The circumstances indicated that such use and occupancy was more than a mere visit or temporary expedient.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs and final order directed for landlord as prayed for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Irweis Holding Corp. v. GlennAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hudson View Properties v. WeissAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
  2. Fraydun Enterprises v. EttingerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1977
  3. Mihil Co. v. ParadisoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980
  4. Fraydun Enterprises v. EttingerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976
  5. North Shore Plaza Associates v. GuidaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API