People v. Paden
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant and his codefendant Jerome Handy were *555charged with various crimes arising from a robbery of a jewelry store.
We find that the hearing court properly refused to suppress the identification testimony of certain witnesses. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not prejudiced by the failure of the police to preserve the photographs shown to the two store employees since the object was to see if they could identify the codefendant and, in fact, the photo array did not contain the defendant’s photograph (see, People v Hernandez, 122 AD2d 856). The defendant was also not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. CarrieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.