Legal Opinion
McKean & Elk Land Imp. Co. v. Kane
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 23, 1892No. Appeal, No. 463PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal, No. 463, Jan. T., 1892, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Elk Co., Feb. T., 1887, No. 232, on verdict for defendants, Elizabeth D. Kane et al. Ejectment.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This case involves the same question as McKean and Elk Land and Improvement Co. v. Clay, just decided. There was undisputed evidence in this case, as well as in the one referred to, that the plaintiff had notice some ten or eleven years prior to the commencement of this action of the purchase by Kane of the land in question. The learned judge, therefore, properly held that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by the act of 1856.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- City of New Orleans v. B. D. Wood & Bro.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1882
- Greig v. EastinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878