Strassner v. D'Atri
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Counsel for plaintiff in error, to sustain their contention, place their reliance solely upon the case of Foos v Teeters, a decision of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth District, reported in 8 Abs 735. In that case it appears that the plaintiff had brought suit against two defendants for damages for personal injuries and there was a verdict against one of the defendants. The court, in the course of its opinion, says:
“The jury, by its verdict, made no finding for or against the defendant Teeters and the judgment was rendered against Louis Hammer'alone for the amount of the verdict and for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Foos v. TeetersOhio Court of Appeals · 1930