State v. St. Amour
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, C.J.
The defendant is appealing his conviction for vandalism, contending that the trial court’s charge unfairly benefited the State. The language in question dealt with the State’s relationship to the witnesses it introduced. The defendant claims that the charge given misstates the law, and that, even in particulars where it does not, it prejudicially favors the prosecution.
The evidence dealt with damage done to the automobile owned by the principal of Burlington High School while it was parked in the school lot on a school day in May. Taking it in the light most favorable to the party prevailing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. SlackSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
- State v. MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
- State v. PersuittiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
- State v. KennisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. DoucetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- State v. JaramilloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- State v. MosherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- State v. CamleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- State v. GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.