Legal Opinion

United States v. Bernard

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided December 21, 2010No. CGCMG 0262PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClelland, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted mem*695bers. Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted of two specifications of wrongful sexual contact, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 920; one specification of assault, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 928; and one specification each of indecent assault and indecent language, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The court sentenced Appellant to restriction for two months, reduction to E-3, and a bad-conduct…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  5. United States v. TooheyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HugheyU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
  2. United States v. BernardU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
  3. United States v. BernardU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API