Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Malagic
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided September 16, 2014PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order, dated December 14, 2012, reversed, with $10 costs, and matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
Landlord commenced the within nonpayment summary proceeding to recover rent arrears of over $17,000 upon a verified petition acknowledging (para 9) that the demised apartment is “presently subject” to rent stabilization and that the rent demanded “does not exceed the lawful stabilized rent.” In response, tenant appellant’s amended answer asserted claims for rent overcharge and treble damages. The parties stipulated to have the trial court…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- KSLM-Columbus Apartments, Inc. v. New York State Division of HousingNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Bogoni v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gordon v. 305 Riverside Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Blumenthal v. Chung Fu LamCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
4Cited by3 opinions
- 329 Union Building Corp. v. LoGuidiceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2015
- Goldman v. MalagicAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2020
- Thompson Assets LLC v. RaffeloAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018