Legal Opinion

Harper v. City of Birmingham

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 29, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 84V-1678-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VARNER, District Judge.

This cause is now before the Court on various motions filed herein by the respective parties. Due to this Court’s Opinion, infra, that Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are due to be granted, all *673other pending motions, except for Plaintiffs motion filed herein March 27, 1986, for leave to amend complaint, are due to be denied as moot. For good cause shown, Plaintiff’s motion filed herein March 27, 1986, is due to be granted.

This Court has jurisdiction over this cause as to Defendant City of Birmingham pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. As will be…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harper v. City of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Randles v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API