Legal Opinion

Matter of Detention of Pugh

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 11, 1993No. 15430-7-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.

Robbie Pugh challenges his detention under the involuntary commitment statutes, contending that the State is using the commitment process as additional punishment for two statutory rape convictions for which he served a prison term. He asserts that his commitment is inharmonious with legislative intent and that his prior convictions provide insufficient evidence of a recent overt act to support a finding that he presents a likelihood of serious harm to others as required under RCW 71.05.320(2)(b). We affirm.

In 1986, Pugh pleaded guilty to two counts of first degree statutory rape involving 8-…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Project Release v. PrevostCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Detention of Henrickson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Detention of AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Henrickson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. In re the Detention of RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. Bauer v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API