Smith v. Arthur

*61The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

We have carefully examined the record in this case, as well as the brief of the appellant, and find that all of the pertinent questions raised have been decided by this court, either in Keane v. Brygger, 3 Wash. 338 (28 Pac. Rep. 653), or Brygger v. Schweitzer, 5 Wash. 564 (32 Pac. Rep. 462), and most of them in both of the above named cases, so that we do not feel it incumbent upon us to again enter into a discussion of their merits.

So far as the question of improvements made on the land by appellant is concerned, we are of the opinion…