Trenton Cotton Oil Co. v. COMMISSIONER OF INT. REVENUE
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Respondent on rehearing, urges that in no event does Section 118 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 118, apply to the losses on the sales of cotton futures by petitioner, because in its switching operations, petitioner did not sell and repurchase substantially identical property.
The factual base for respondent’s contention is (a) that in each switching transaction, the date of the delivery of the oil in the contract purchased was later than in the contract sold, thu's the contracts matured at different times; (b) that in some instances when one…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hanlin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Havana Madrid Restaurant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Forward Communications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Corn Products Refining Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Sayre v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.