Legal Opinion
Przybyszewski v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 4, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The petitioner failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for waiting almost four months after the prescribed 90-day period to commence the instant proceeding against the City of New York (see, Matter of Stenowich v Colonie Indus. Dev. Agency, 151 AD2d 894; Matter of Hunt v City of New Rochelle, 223 AD2d 643). Further, there is no evidence in the record to establish that the City of New York acquired actual notice of the essential facts constituting the petitioner’s claim within the prescribed 90-day period or a reasonable time thereafter (see, Matter of Zbryski v City of New York, 147 AD2d 705;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stenowich v. Colonie Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Caruso v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Zbryski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Hunt v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Huebner v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Pukifoy v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Lisciandri v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Matter of Moroz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018