State ex rel. Duane v. Fagan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Information in the nature of a quo warranto ; brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County. The answer of the respondent was demurred to, and the case reserved upon the pleadings for the advice of this court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The answer of the respondent to this information being demurred to, the principal question involved is the sufficiency of that answer.
The respondent rests his claim to the office in controversy, that of school district committee, on two grounds :
1. An election to the same by the voters of the district, duly assembled in district meeting on the 10th day of August, 1874. 2. If that election was invalid for any cause, the respondent, having been the incumbent of the office the year before, is entitled to hold over, under the law, till the vacancy is filled, which he insists has not yet been…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. Richardson v. HendersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Mallett v. PlumbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission Appeal of John E. Moss, Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, United States House of RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Howland v. PrenticeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.