Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Marx

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 2013No. 47,658-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaraway, J.

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff asserts that his surgeon was required to inform him prior to elective surgery of the surgeon’s own eye surgery which had occurred eight days earlier. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant physician after determining that there existed no genuine issue of material fact regarding breach of the standard of care. We affirm.

Facts

On September 21, 2007, urologist, Dr. Don Marx, performed an elective vasectomy on John Roberts. The vasectomy procedure involves the separation of blood vessels from the vas which is then…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. Pfiffner v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Schultz v. GuothSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  5. Wright v. Louisiana Power & LightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BaileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Magee v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Thames v. ThamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Fanguy v. PatwardhanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Lee v. McGovernLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API