Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Board of Directors

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1987No. 86-694PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C. J.

The principal issue in •this case is whether the trial court erred in enjoining the board from entering into agreements pursuant to the authority of the Third Amendment. The first question presented by this case is whether the board of directors of Anchor Pointe, elected on March 8,1984, was legally constituted. This necessitates a determination of the status of First Federal. If, as appellants contend, First Federal was a good faith purchaser for value, then it was entitled to vote for all members of the condominium association’s board of directors in proportion to its unit ownership.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chotka v. Fidelco Growth InvestorsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. East Cleveland Democratic Club, Inc. v. BibbOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. First Fed. Sav. & Loan v. Dept. of Bus. Reg.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LundgrenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Abrahamsen v. Laurel Gardens Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  3. State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Your Community Bank, Inc. v. Woodlawn Springs Homeowners Ass'nKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Altoona First Savings Bank, a PA Chartered Mutual Savings Bank v. The Twp. of Logan ~ Appeal of: Twp. of LoganCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API