Legal Opinion

Ray v. United Elkhorn Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 7, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to, and dismissing, the petition as amended.

Briefly stated, the facts pleaded in the original petition are these: Though employing more than five men, the defendant, United Elkhorn Coal Company, had not accepted the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Ky. Stats., sec. 4880 et seq.). On August 14,1930, and prior thereto, plaintiff was engaged by the defendant for the purpose of loading and mining coal. While lifting and raising large lumps of coal under the direction of defendant’s agents, who were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Central R. R. v. LanganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Co. v. TackittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Wall v. LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Deboe's Administrator v. West Kentucky Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Nashville, C., & St. L. Ry. Co. v. CleaverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Davidson v. Perkins-Bowling Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Christopher's Administrator v. Blanton Stone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API