Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hixon v. Schofield

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for Mandamus to Lafayette County Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

The relator was suspended from the office of clerk of the *39County Court of Lafayette county by order of the County Court, and he prays for a mandamus to compel the said County Court to file charges against him with the Attorney-General, that he may have a trial according to law. The answer, among other things, states that the defendants have filed the charges with the Attorney-General, but at what time they were-made out and placed in his hands is not alleged.

The relator’s counsel demurs to the return, because it is not therein stated that the charges were referred to the Attorney-General…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Priddy v. GibsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. Simon v. DurhamOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Goodnow v. Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. State ex rel. Ranney v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Boody v. WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API