Legal Opinion

Dinan v. Swig

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 6, 1916PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a petition brought under St. 1913, c. 835, § 369, as amended by St. 1914, c. 783, § 10, which relates to corrupt practices in elections, against the respondent, who was elected a member of the General Court of the Commonwealth for 1916. Summarily stated, the statute, so- far as here material, requires that, upon petition of five or more voters having reasonable cause to believe that there has been committed by a successful candidate, (for whom they had a right to vote,) in connection with his election or in his interest and behalf a corrupt practice as defined in the act, three judges…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coffin v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. City of Boston v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Case of Supervisors of ElectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Peabody v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  2. Galloway v. TruesdellNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Matter of RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API