Legal Opinion

Nasso v. Loeb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter aha, to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Solomon, J.), dated March 29, 2004, which granted the defendant’s motion to stay the prosecution of the action pending arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the arbitration clause at issue contained in the parties’ March 29, 2000, retainer agreement is clear, explicit, and unequivocal, and all of the plaintiffs claims fall within the broad scope of this arbitration clause (see Stoll Am.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stoll America Knitting MacHinery, Inc. v. Creative Knitwear Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Estate of CassoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Menche v. Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Breitstone, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Cinelli Builders, Inc. v. FerrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Stark v. Molod Spitz DeSantis & Stark, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API