Legal Opinion

Feinberg v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 2, 1939No. Gen. No. 40,542PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

A suit for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case defendant made a motion, in writing, for a peremptory instruction, accompanied by an instruction, to find defendant not guilty, which motion and instruction were refused. Defendant offered no evidence, but again moved for a peremptory instruction of not guilty, accompanied by a written instruction to that effect, and the trial court reserved its ruling upon the motion and instruction. The jury returned a verdict finding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BodemerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Walldren Express & Van Co. v. KrugIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Brown v. Illinois Terminal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Jeneary v. Chicago & Interurban Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Chicago City Railway Co. v. TuohyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pittman v. DugganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  2. Geiselman v. StrubharAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API