Legal Opinion

Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 19, 1953No. C. D. 1549PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This case is before us on a motion made by counsel for the Government to dismiss the protest with respect to entry No. 6708 on the ground of untimeliness. The protest covers three entries of merchandise described as hair-on leather, imported from Canada on various dates between March 14, 1949, and June 13, 1949, and entered at the port of Niagara Falls, N. Y.

An examination of the official papers discloses that entry No. 6708 is marked “Liquidated as Noted Sep 15 1949.” The protest was filed more than 60 days thereafter, on November 17, 1949. On its face, it is untimely within…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Felix v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Curtis v. ConnlySupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Bacardi Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API