Love v. Foster
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POLITZ, Chief Judge:
On remand from the Supreme Court and this court the trial judge, in light of a failure by the Louisiana Legislature to correct a constitutional defect in the state’s election code, set the dates for Louisiana’s future congressional elections. The plaintiffs appeal this order, contending that by striking down the provision for an October election for congressional office the Supreme Court vitiated the entire election code. They further contend that by operation of Louisiana law, the election system replaced by the present code automatically is revived. For the reasons…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leavitt v. Jane L.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Polk v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Foster v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Perschall v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- State v. AzarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United Transportation Union v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- FORUM FOR EQUALITY v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Love v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2004
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.