Legal Opinion

State v. Cunningham, 89043 (2-28-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2008No. 89043UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Harold Cunningham ("defendant"), appeals following his convictions on five counts of rape and five counts of kidnapping. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

{¶ 2} Defendant was indicted with multiple counts of rape and multiple counts of kidnapping involving a five-year-old victim. Defendant was indicted with other counts that involved a different victim, which the trial court dismissed pursuant to Crim.R. 29 and are not the subject of the present appeal.

{¶ 3} Prior to trial, defense counsel made an oral motion for a more definite bill of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. CobbOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API