Wick v. Roop
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 102, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1914, No. 2299, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Annie E. Wick, Administratrix of the Estate of David B. Wick, Deceased, v. Cordelia G. Boop. Scire facias sur mortgage. Before Dougherty, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,405 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 102, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1914, No. 2299, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Annie E. Wick, Administratrix of the Estate of David B. Wick, Deceased, v. Cordelia G. Boop. Scire facias sur mortgage. Before Dougherty, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,405 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were rulings on evidence and instructions to the jury.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potter,
This was a scire facias brought by the administratrix of the estate of D. B. Wick, deceased, .against the defendant to recover the amount of a mortgage for $3,000, secured upon property of defendant. The defense was payment. On the trial it appeared that, on February 27, 1911, the defendant borrowed from D. B. Wick the sum of $3,500, and gave him two bonds and mortgages, one for $3,000, being the mortgage in suit, and the other for $500, both payable at the expiration of five years. Defendant alleged that on March 27, 1911, she paid Wick $500 in satisfaction of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clymer v. GroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Grimes v. HilliaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Crocker v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1841
- Helzer v. HelzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark v. SpheenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921