Legal Opinion

Payne v. Redington

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided August 9, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00024Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION BRANDON C. PAYNE, ) Petitioner, V. No. 2:21-CV-24-JAR DAN REDINGTON, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This Court previously ordered petitioner to demonstrate why his Petition Under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

for Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be dismissed as time-barred, and petitioner has now responded. Having reviewed and considered petitioner’s response, the Court has determined to dismiss the petition without further proceedings. Background As fully explained in this Court’s May 14, 2021 order, and as petitioner concedes,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API