Payne v. Redington
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION BRANDON C. PAYNE, ) Petitioner, V. No. 2:21-CV-24-JAR DAN REDINGTON, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This Court previously ordered petitioner to demonstrate why his Petition Under
28 U.S.C. § 2254
for Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be dismissed as time-barred, and petitioner has now responded. Having reviewed and considered petitioner’s response, the Court has determined to dismiss the petition without further proceedings. Background As fully explained in this Court’s May 14, 2021 order, and as petitioner concedes,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.