Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Lamb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1997Published

1Dissent

Peters, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. In the unique situation presented by this appeal, I believe a remittal is called for.

The trial commenced the morning of Monday, September 19, 1994. Appearances were noted and, before jury selection commenced, defense counsel agreed to waive the full record with respect to jury selection. County Court then stated, "And when your client arrives, which I understand will be later this morning, will you discuss with him whether or not he will agree to waive his attendance at the side bar conferences?” After defense counsel agreed, counsel and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. NeelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. BoomerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API