Haines v. Board of Supervisors
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to compel the respondent to allow the township of Thomastown a certain credit, and to provide for its payment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
This is a petition for mandamus to compel the county of Saginaw to allow the township of Thomastown a credit for $1,830.48 and interest, and to provide for the payment thereof. The claim grows out of charges claimed to have been made against the township by the county of Saginaw under Act No. 169, Laws of 1869.
It appears that at the April term of this Court, in 1886, a petition was filed by the Auditor General against the supervisors of the county of Saginaw, to compel that county to apportion $96,046.01 among the several townships of that county, and to collect the same, and cause that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stevens v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- King v. Antrim Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Haines v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894