Legal Opinion

Collard v. Hohnstein

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1918No. 9091PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Logan District Court, Hon. Haslett P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

This is an action brought under section 3634, R. S. 1908, for treble damages for the alleged unlawful seizure, under process, by a constable, of property claimed to be exempt from execution sale. Verdict and judgment were for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error and brings the judgment here for review.

The sole question is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the case. The theory of plaintiff in error is that no action for the wrongful levy of an attachment writ will lie against a constable making such levy, and that the only remedy open is under sections 3782 and 3783,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. Harrington v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. White Pine Lumber Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Harding v. BurrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Duncan v. BurchinellColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Kyllo v. PanzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API