Legal Opinion

Barton Beek and Dorothy M. Beek v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Gerald T. And Anne Sparling v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 1985No. 83-7937, 84-7157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners were limited partners of a calendar year, cash-basis partnership. The partnership bought real property in 1976 under a contract calling for installment payments, and prepaid one year’s worth of interest. The partners deducted that prepaid interest in full in 1976, and the Commissioner disallowed the portion of the deduction allocable to 1977. The Tax Court, 80 T.C. 1024, upheld the Commissioner, and the partners appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

All of the petitioners were limited partners of Crystal, a California cash-basis, calendar year partnership formed in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hogg v. RuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. United States v. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Arthur v. Morgan and Dorothy O. Morgan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. E. E. R. Shapiro and Rubye Shapiro v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Capital Artists, LLC, Derivatively on Behalf of Active Protective Technologies, Inc. v. Asahi Kasei Holdings US, Inc., and Active Protective Technologies, Inc., NominalMassachusetts Superior Court · 2026
  2. Estate of Van Loben Sels v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  3. Fox v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  4. Hedlund v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  5. Norgaard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API