Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentStafford, J.
(dissenting) — Ever since statehood the Washington courts and the legislature have consistently and universally rejected the concept of general unlimited punitive damages. Absent a statutory directive punitive damages have not been available. I therefore must dissent from the majority's unnecessary inroad into this well established and previously consistent rule.
I agree with the abstract concept that under the "most *425significant contacts" theory California law should govern this transaction. Nevertheless, the normal "choice of law" result must be overridden by strong public policy in this, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Sidney Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- James v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Hughes v. FetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lazenby Ex Rel. Lazenby v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.