Legal Opinion
Biosynexus, Inc. v. Glaxo Group Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 17, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered March 14, 2006, which, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion by plaintiff Biosynexus, Inc. for a preliminary injunction, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate so much of the injunction as enjoins defendant Glaxo Group Limited (Glaxo) from “failing to exploit the intellectual property, including the confidential information, licensed by Biosynexus to Glaxo pursuant to the Collaborative Development [CDA] and License Agreement,” and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The motion court did not err in concluding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- SportsChannel America Associates v. National Hockey LeagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Willis of New York, Inc. v. DeFeliceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hay Group, Inc. v. NadelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Bottlers Seal Co. v. . RaineyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sand Canyon Corp. v. Homeward Residential, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sand Canyon Corp. v. Homeward Residential, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013