Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 1, 2003No. 2002-637PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The intervenor, Acadia Insurance Company (Acadia), appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Smith, J.) approving a settlement between the plaintiffs, Richard and Margaret Knapp, and the defendants. We affirm.
Richard Knapp (Knapp) sustained permanent injuries while at work for which he received workers’ compensation benefits from Acadia, his employer’s compensation insurance carrier. Knapp filed suit against the defendants to recover damages for his injuries. See RSA 281-A:13, 1(a) (1999). The suit settled before trial, with $183,000 of the settlement being allocated to Knapp’s wife, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Hunter v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Del Rio v. Northern Blower Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- McIntire v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. BowerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Appeal of LangenfeldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Appeal of Thomas PhillipsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- AMTRUST N. AM., INC. v. VASQUEZ, JR.Nevada Supreme Court · 2024