State v. Clark
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurrence
JUSTICE NELSON,
specially concurring.
¶19 I believe that the Court’s Opinion correctly and fully resolves the specific issue presented by Clark-namely, whether the District Court erred in its determination that his appeal from the Municipal Court was untimely. However, the obvious question left unanswered by our Opinion-because Clark failed to raise it-is whether it was appropriate for the District Court to dismiss Clark’s untimely appeal sua sponte. In view of recent decisions of this Court and the United States Supreme Court, I write separately to explain why, in my view, the ground provided…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.