Page v. Lytle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 87, Jan. T., 1910, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Blair Co., Equity Docket D, No. 639, directing defendant to accept deed and pay consideration in case of Fannie L. Page, Florence L. Ormsby and Caroline Ormsby v. Edward H. Lytle. . Bill for specific performance of agreement for the division of land. Before Bell, P. J. The facts appear in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in findings and refusals to find and decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The bill in this case was for the specific performance of an agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant for the division of lands devised to them. The first assignment of error is the only one that is supported by the record. The other assignments relate to matters not excepted to in the common pleas and they cannot be considered. The rules of equity practice provide for the filing of exceptions to a decree nisi that shall cover all objections to rulings on evidence, findings of fact or law and to the decree of the court. Rule 67 is: “Upon appeal to the Supreme or Superior…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beatty v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schwartz v. WesokySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Trustees of the Proprietors of Kingston v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912