Legal Opinion
Daniel Sandlin v. Tamara Sandlin
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 2012No. 29A02-1110-DR-969PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Chief Judge.
Case Summary and Issues
Several months after the dissolution of the marriage of Daniel Sandlin (“Father”) and Tamara Sandlin (“Mother”), Father filed a verified motion for emergency hearing and modification of custody, and Mother filed a verified petition to modify child support. Following a hearing, the trial court entered an order which Father now appeals and Mother cross appeals.
Father does not challenge the trial court’s order to modify child support, but raises two challenges to the trial court’s calculations in doing so. We expand and restate Father’s challenges…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carter v. DayhuffIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Grant v. HagerIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Matter of Paternity of BuehlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mark H. Miller, II v. Leigh Anne MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Karen B. Salser v. Gregg A. SalserIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Angela Harris v. Eric Harris (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- David Delong v. Kim DelongIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re The Marriage of Laura R. Chickadaunce and Mark A. Chickadaunce Laura R. Chickadaunce v. Mark A. ChickadaunceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.