Legal Opinion

Samayoa v. Greenwood Inn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 1994No. WCB 91-04436; CA A76464Published

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it does not have jurisdiction to review an order of the Director under ORS 656.245(1)03) regarding the compensability of palliative care. We have decided most of the issues she raises contrary to her position in Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit, 126 Or App 172, 866 P2d 525 (1994), and Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or App 549, 865 P2d 503 (1993). The constitutional issues that she raises were not raised below, and we will not address them for the first time on review.

Claimant also asserts that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. Health Future EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Nicholson v. Salem Area TransitCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API