Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 11, 1960No. 33PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
In view of ambiguities in the record as to the issues sought to be tendered, made apparent in. oral argument and the memoranda of counsel subsequently filed at the Court’s request, the writ of. certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or. decision of this case.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Hodgson v. Stokely-Van CampDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
- Yogurt Master, Inc. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Etc. v. Twin City Foods, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Doe v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Doe v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.