State ex rel. Upper v. Hanna
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered June 4, 1914, dismissing an action for a writ of mandamus, tried to the court and a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The statement of the issues made by appellant is agreed by respondent to be full and correct and is here adopted:
On March 13, 1914, the appellant filed a petition for a writ of mandate against the respondent, praying that such writ issue commanding the respondent to pay to the appellant the amount of a warrant for $3,000, drawn in his favor by the county auditor, or show cause why he should not be required so to do. This petition was supported by the affidavit of the relator, in which it appeared that the defendant, at all times in the affidavit mentioned, was the duly elected, qualified and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PointerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- City of Kansas City v. SlangstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Comer v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Roberts v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Nath v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bass v. DehnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Van Cleve v. BettsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Department of Highways v. Evans Engine & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Department of Highways v. Evans Engine & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978