Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Stone Works, Inc. v. Probel Holding Corp.
New York City Court
Decided February 27, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The chattels sought to be replevied are a concrete stone fountain and concrete flower boxes, which are actually attached by cement to the realty, the fountain to the land, and the flower boxes to the building. The stone fountain is provided with pipes, so that water flows therein, and with electric wires so that it may be lighted, and, with the flower boxes, provides ornamentation for the building. Not only is there physical annexation, but the chattels are used in connection with, are applied *520and adapted to the realty, and there is every indication that the intention of the party making the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Central Union Gas Co. v. . BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- De Bevoise v. Maple Avenue Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Cohen v. 1165 Fulton Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gottfried v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1960
- Prudence-Bonds Corp. v. 1000 Island House Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930
- Modern Security Co. v. ThwaitesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930