Blanos v. Kulesva

The majority opinion holds that the statutory provisions in question apply only to beginners who are receiving instruction for the purpose of qualifying as licensed drivers, and that as the plaintiff’s driver in the instant case had had previous experience, she was not a beginner and her operation of this car was illegal. I am unable to concur in those views. It is true, as we said in Hughes v. New Haven Taxicab Co., 87 Conn. 416, 87 Atl. 721, that this legislation provided a method by which beginners could learn to operate a motor vehicle. We did not say, nor do I believe the intent to have…