People v. Perryman

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03). His contention that County Court erred in permitting a police officer to testify concerning defendant’s intent to sell drugs is not preserved for our review because defendant failed to raise that contention at trial (see, People v Espinal, 174 AD2d 500, lv denied 79 NY2d 826). In any event, we conclude that any error…