Legal Opinion

Natl. Bank of Hopewell, Va. v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1927No. 2897. [fn*]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

In consideration of cases submitted in this court, we are limited to a consideration of the record and only matters that properly appear therein. For that reason, we think that it is far better for attorneys to recognize the rule and refrain from discussing things not contained in the record, for such discussion only enlarges the quantity of reading matter for this court’s perusal.

Taking the trial court’s findings of fact as a basis, we make the following statement of the case before us:

In a suit pending in the county court at law of Wichita county, in which appellant herein was plaintiff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. London Assurance Corp. v. T. H. Lee & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Pierson v. BurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Wood v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Lytle v. CusteadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Harrison v. FryarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lerer v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Wendy Kritzer v. Scott E. Kasden, M.D. and Scott E. Kasden, M.D., P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API