Legal Opinion

Medley v. Maryville City Beer Board

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

These two cases were consolidated for trial. Both appellee Medley and appellee Milsaps held licenses for the sale of beer issued by the City of Maryville for the period December 3, 1983, through December 2, 1984. Employees of each of these licensees sold a six-pack of beer to a seventeen-year-old youth on October 12, 1984. Because it was his first established violation of the liquor laws, the Beer Board suspended the license of Medley for ten days. The offense was the second violation occurring at the premises of Milsaps, and *892his license was suspended for a period of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Patty v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. ParrMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Kearns v. AragonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Richards v. Lewisburg Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. E & J Lounge Operating Co. v. Liquor Commission of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. City of Bismarck v. DePriestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. E & J Lounge Operating Co. v. Liquor Commission of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. G and N Restaurant Group, Inc. d/b/a City Cafe Diner v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API