Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bess v. Berger

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1998No. 25202PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:1

Petitioner Mary Elizabeth Bess seeks a writ of mandamus2 directing the Honorable Irene Berger to hear and consider her exceptions to Family Law Master Page Hamrick’s recommended order. Since Petitioner had failed to file her exceptions to the recommended order within the ten-day period provided by West Virginia Code § 48A-4-17(a) (1998), the circuit court took the position that it was without authority to consider Petitioner’s exceptions. After fully considering this issue, we grant a moulded writ of mandamus solely to require Judge Berger to hold a hearing on Petitioner’s motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Lieving v. HadleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cheney v. Anchor Glass Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Hinerman v. LevinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Savas v. SavasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Delapp v. DelappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API