Legal Opinion

Nolan-Bey v. Wickham Glass, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 15, 2018No. 17-3259UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Carlos F. Lucero, Circuit Judge

Marques Nolan-Bey appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

I

Nolan-Bey filed suit against Wickham Industries, Inc., which he incorrectly named in his complaint as Wickham Glass, Inc., and two of its employees. He alleged that defendants failed to train him properly and terminated his employment. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

The district court granted the defendants’ motion, concluding that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. Carroll v. MooreheadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carter v. Security Transportation Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API