Boll v. Schendleholz, No. 097177 (Apr. 16, 1992)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#118) After hearing held on defendant's motion for summary judgment, it is hereby ORDERED: Denied; for the following reasons:

In ruling on the instant motion, the court is required to examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission, 158 Conn. 364,380 (1969); Maruca v. Standard, 19 Conn. App. 16, 19 (1989).

Whether the defendant knew, or should have known of a dangerous condition, such as would give rise to a duty to warn, presents a question of…